We recommend steel piers over polyurethane foam when a permanent, engineered structural solution is required. While polyurethane foam is an effective tool for filling voids and performing minor, non-structural lifts for concrete slabs (typically under 2 inches), it is not a permanent fix for structural foundation settlement.
Our advanced earth anchoring systems are designed to address the root cause of settlement by transferring building loads past unstable surface soils down to competent load-bearing strata or bedrock. There are three primary reasons why our engineering team and network of structural engineers prefer steel systems:
- Superior Load-Bearing Capacity: Steel helical or push piers can support loads exceeding 100 tons per pier. In contrast, polyurethane foam is generally limited to lifting slabs and supporting lighter loads, typically under 20 tons.
- Stability in Expansive or Wet Soils: In environments with high moisture or expansive clay, shallow solutions like foam can be compromised by soil movement. Steel piers bypass these active zones entirely, providing long-term durability that foam cannot match.
- Permanent Underpinning: Unlike foam, which may degrade or require re-application over time, our ICC and ISO Certified products provide a permanent foundation repair solution. Steel systems are the industry standard for perimeter foundations, load-bearing walls, and commercial columns.
Because every project presents unique geotechnical challenges, we provide Engineering Excellence and Design Support to ensure the right system is utilized.
Consult a structural engineer or the manufacturer’s engineering team for project-specific design and installation guidance. Products are certified to ICC/ISO where indicated — installations must comply with applicable building codes and ICC-ES acceptance criteria (AC358).
Related FAQs
-
Can Polyurethane Foam Stabilize a Settling Home without Underpinning?
Read More »: Can Polyurethane Foam Stabilize a Settling Home without Underpinning?Polyurethane foam is generally not recommended for structural foundation stabilization. While it is an effective tool for slab jacking—which involves lifting non-structural concrete like sidewalks, driveways, or interior slabs with less than 2 inches of settlement—it lacks the capacity to…
-
Is Polyurethane Foam Injection a Permanent Solution for Foundation Lifting?
Read More »: Is Polyurethane Foam Injection a Permanent Solution for Foundation Lifting?Polyurethane foam injection is not a permanent solution for structural loads or foundation settlement. While it is an effective tool for non-structural applications, such as filling minor voids or leveling interior slabs, sidewalks, and driveways, it lacks the engineered capacity…
-
Which is Better for Fixing Uneven Concrete Slabs: Foam or Piers?
Read More »: Which is Better for Fixing Uneven Concrete Slabs: Foam or Piers?The choice between polyurethane foam and steel piers depends on whether you are looking for a surface-level lift or a permanent structural solution. While both address settlement, they serve very different purposes: When to choose steel piers: We recommend engineered…
-
Why do some Foundation Experts Recommend Steel Piers over Polyurethane Foam for Structural Issues?
Read More »: Why do some Foundation Experts Recommend Steel Piers over Polyurethane Foam for Structural Issues?We recommend steel piers over polyurethane foam when a permanent, engineered structural solution is required. While polyurethane foam is an effective tool for filling voids and performing minor, non-structural lifts for concrete slabs (typically under 2 inches), it is not…
-
What are the Pros and Cons of Polyurethane Foam Vs. Steel Piering?
Read More »: What are the Pros and Cons of Polyurethane Foam Vs. Steel Piering?When evaluating polyurethane foam vs steel piers, the choice depends on whether you need a temporary surface fix or a permanent structural repair. Polyurethane Foam Injection (Slab Jacking) Steel Piers (Helical or Push Piers) While foam is a suitable tool…